(Updated) JavaServer Faces 1.2 and JavaServer Pages 2.1 Proposed Final Draft Specifications available
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the Proposed Final Draft
revisions of the next release of the JavaServerTM Faces and
Pages specifications. The Faces spec may be downloaded from <
href="http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=252">http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=252>
and the Pages spec may be downloaded from <
href="http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=245">http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=245>
We really want feedback! Please use our
href="http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=617376&tstart=0">Forum
to share your thoughts on the specs. Or you may send feedback to
the comments alias for
title="[PUBLIC REVIEW FEEDBACK]">Faces or
href="mailto:jsr-245-comments@jcp.org" title="[PUBLIC REVIEW
FEEDBACK]">JSP (
title="[PUBLIC REVIEW FEEDBACK]">jsr-252-comments@jcp.org and
href="mailto:jsr-245-comments@jcp.org" title="[PUBLIC REVIEW
FEEDBACK]">jsr-245-comments@jcp.org respectively) .
In this entry, I link to a comprehensive high level outline of the
changes to the spec since the 1.1 release of the Faces spec. I've
decided include changes present in the
href="http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/edr/jsr252/">December
Early Draft Release, the
href="http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/pr/jsr252/">April Public
Review Release and the current Proposed Final Draft release for
completeness. As such, this entry repeats some information from my
href="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2005/04/javaserver_face_1.html">
blog entry on the April Public Review Release. If you're looking
for what's new since that the Public Review release only, please consult
href="https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/buglist.cgi?component=javaserverfaces-spec-public&issue_status=UNCONFIRMED&issue_status=NEW&issue_status=STARTED&issue_status=REOPENED&issue_status=RESOLVED&issue_status=VERIFIED&issue_status=CLOSED&email1=&emailtype1=exact&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=exact&emailreporter2=1&issueidtype=include&issue_id=7%2C+8%2C+12%2C+29%2C+32%2C+47%2C+50%2C+53%2C+54%2C+56%2C+68%2C+73%2C+75%2C+76%2C+78%2C+79%2C+80%2C+81%2C+82%2C+84%2C+85%2C+86%2C+87%2C+94%2C+98%2C+44%2C+79&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&short_desc=&short_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&issue_file_loc=&issue_file_loc_type=substring&status_whiteboard=&status_whiteboard_type=substring&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&cmdtype=doit&namedcmd=IssuesResolvedPRtoPFD&newqueryname=&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&Submit+query=Submit+query">this
issue tracker query.
Keep in mind this is a high level outline, for details, I
encourage you to read the relevant sections of the spec itself.
Before we get to the outline, here is a brief summary of the main
changes:
-
Unified EL
The expression language used in Faces, which
was inspired by the expression language used in
JSTL and JSP, has been generalized and extracted
into its own top leveljavax.el
package. The EL is agnostic of the technology
hosting it, such as JSP or Faces, and is intended
to be generally useful in the same way one can use
OGNL in a variety of applications. Faces now has
deprecated its internal EL in favor of using the
Unified EL. -
New Tree Creation and Content Interweaving
Model for Faces applications that use JSPWhile it is perfectly acceptable to use Faces
without using JSP, many people find their
productivity increases when using these two
technologies together. Unfortunately, as amply
documented by href="http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2004/06/09/jsf.html">Hans
Bergsten in his article at onjava.com, there
were some integration cases that didn't work as
expected. By changing the specification of the
implementation of the Faces ViewHandler for JSP,
as well as changing the JSP custom tag base class
used by all Faces component tags, these problems
have all been resolved. -
Integration with JSTL
Another long standing problem was in using JSTL's
<c:forEach>tag to contain Faces input
components. Because JSP has no notion of a postback, it was
not possible to apply the values correctly to the nested input
components on postback. By introducing some new concepts into
the EL, it is now possible to fully use
<c:forEach>with any kind of Faces
component. This will require a new release of JSTL, which
will also be present in J2EE 5, along with Faces and JSP. -
Back Button issues and Multi Frame or Multi Window
Faces AppsDue to a deficiency in the State Management API using Faces
in Multi Frame or Multi Window applications presented some
problems. The browser back button also could cause
application state to become confused. These problems have now
been fixed. -
Associating a message with a particular component in
the page.Previous revisions of the spec didn't allow for
dynamically including the label of a component in an error
message for that component. New spec features now allow for
this to happen.It is now possible to override the conversion or
validation message that is displayed to the user on a
per-instance basis. For example:<pre>
<h:inputText value="#{bean.value}"
requiredMessage="#{bundle.requiredMessage}"
converterMessage="#{bundle.converterMessage}"
validatorMessage="#{bundle.requiredMessage}">
<f:validateLongRange maximum="1" minimum="10"/>
</h:inputText>
</pre> -
AJAX support
As you should all know by know, AJAX is mainly a
component thing, but there are some things the basic JSF
framework can do to make things a little easier for those
writing AJAXian JSF components. Even without these features
(ie, in JSF 1.1), href="https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/nonav/ajax/jsf-ajax/frames.html">it's
very easy to write AJAX components for JSF and easier
still to use them.Specify that the
FacesServletshould look
for aninit-paramcalled
javax.faces.LIFECYCLE_ID to identify the Lifecycle to be
used for processing this request. This approach allows you
to map different instances of theFacesServlet
with different lifecycles. For example, one mapping for
standard JSF requests and another for AJAX JSF requests.Specify the name of the state saving parameter so that
AJAX scripts can manually post back the state to the server
using XMLHttpRequest, therefore enabling the AJAX processing
code to have access to the full view. This approach was
used in the href="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2005/05/ajaxian_faces_p.html">Progress
Bar JSF component. The name of the parameter is
javax.faces.ViewState. -
Expose an application wide ResourceBundle to the EL.
We have added a new <resource-bundle> element to
the faces-config that allows you to list zero or more
resource bundles that should be exposed to the EL using the
new ELResolver chain. Doing this allows performance
optimizations that prevent the need to create a
ResourceBundle for every request. -
API classes use generics
In response to strong Expert Group demand, we have
applied Java SE 5.0 Generics to the JSF api. Therefore, the
minimum JDK requirement for JSF 1.2 is Java SE 5.0. I'm
told that it's possible to retroweave a binary to make it
run under 1.4, but of course that configuration is not
supported or recommended by Sun.
All of these features and more are currently available in the JSF
implementation found in Sun's Open Source Appserver,
href="https://glassfish.dev.java.net/">glassfish.
Now, the outline of changes is available href="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/outline.html/20050825-outline.html">here.
Technorati Tags: edburns
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- edburns's blog
- 1975 reads





