As a follow up to the past article about Debugging with ME Framework, here is the the guest post from Alexander Alexeev (aka Skavas) on the new feature he has integrated into the ME Framework, the Interactive MIDlet agent. The feature addresses some usability issues of executing large test suites on mobile devices, provides on-screen indication of the testing progress and allows to perform some operations with test results on the device.

Background

The Introduction article described the approaches, used for execution of large test suites for Java ^TM ME implementations as well as some of techniques, allowing to optimize test execution time. To restate the main points, relevant to this debugging topic:

• test execution is managed at the server side
• the test execution process consists of sequential downloads of test MIDlet suites to the device
• during this process AMS and  MIDlet suites exchange control messages with test harness
• one of optimizations, allowing to minimize network traffic and number of downloads/installations/runs/removals, is to package multiple tests into a single bundle.

The diagram describing this autotest cycle can be seen here.

The 'autotest'  approach allows to achieve the sufficient level of automation, that is one of high priority requirements for test suites we develop with JT harness and ME Framework. 

User interactivity here still may be desired in few situations:

• 'sendTestResult' may not be executed for some reason. For example, because of the VM exit or test/VM hang up. Since this operation is executed at the Test level, and Test may consist of multiple test cases, all information from actually executed test cases may be lost. It will be unknown which test case caused the problem.
• when the device is slow and optimization is used (multiple tests in bundle), the whole test cycle will be shorter, but every individual test bundle will take time to execute. Without visual indication it may be hard to distinguish if tests are being executed that slow, or it is just device  stopped responding an hour ago.
• if test hung, it should be possible to cancel it with  minimal impact on the  execution process, without stop/restart the whole test run.

One solution for these debugging problems is using the Test Export feature to run tests isolated from the test harness environment. Test results from standalone execution are not sent to the JT harness, they are displayed on the device console, if there is such available.

Interactivity for Automated Tests

The proposed solution for all above problems is to introduce interactivity at the device side. We added an option to use Interactive MIDlet Agent for test execution, that provides the following features:

• shows the current status on the device display
• continuously saves the current status of the RMS
• provides a control for saving the current status of the RMS
• allows viewing results stored in the RMS
• provides a control for canceling the current test/test bundle and starting the next test/test bundle

These interactive features are also available in the Test Export mode.

User Interface

Additional set of standard configuration questions were added to the ME Framework Configuration Editor. To make ME Framework to use this on screen tracing functionality, see the screenshot .

When the JT harness executes tests with these configuration settings, the user interface on the device side displays the following information and commands:

• Information string with a common count of tests done, a count of failed tests, and a count of passed tests
• Information about the current test running
• Commands to cancel the test/test bundle and to save the results to the RMS

As you can see here , this new interface resembles the interface of device-side harnesses, that are available for execution of mobile variations of JUnit. 

To view results stored in the RMS, use the RMSReader MIDlet application. It has a simple interface that uses a Command to change the display either to "view log" or to "view ref" output.

Open Issues

There should be better solutions then one that we chosen for canceling a hanging test.

The 'cancel test' functionality requires each test to be run in a separate thread. Since Connected Limited Device Configuration has no method to interrupt threads in order to break test execution and proceed to the next test, a special flag is used to mark the test thread as canceled. The canceled thread is set to minimum priority and the agent starts to execute the next test.