Search |
||
Catching Up With OpenDS Community Manager at JavaOnePosted by marinasum on June 5, 2009 at 9:39 AM PDT
OpenDS 2.0 For details on Release Candidate 1, see Ludo's May 25 posting. A New Back-End With the NDB in place, once you've added LDAP tables to a MySQL database, LDAP can immediately access all the data, old and new. So can your existing applications—concurrently, and transactions can then follow. Ludo pointed out that in these days of superfast data growth ("Data will never shrink"), the storage space in a single directory server, no matter how big its capacity, is always limited. Simultaneously, backups become a headache as disk size keeps growing. Thanks to the flexibility in the NDB, the three key components—the LDAP server, the MySQL database, and the NDB APIs—are separate. That means you can connect multiple LDAP servers to the same database, reap the benefits in versatility and flexibility, and rest assured that your data remains integral and complete. "Separate the layers and you'll spare yourself the trouble of having to rearchitecture your directory server," Ludo explained. "For example, for telecommunications companies, which typically must retain a host of customer and other data for an extended period of time to satisfy legal and service requirements, the new setup translates to significant cost and labor savings, not to mention peace of mind." Also, OpenDS is collaborating with OpenLDAP to ensure that both directory servers can share the LDAP tables that you add to enable the NDB. Afterwards, customers can access the data through either OpenDS or OpenLDAP. Talk about flexibility! To learn how to view OpenDS with the new MySQL backend, see the related documentation. Other News Currently, the number of OpenDS users stands at 424 with an overall total of 475. "That's a 100-percent growth from a year ago. We're extremely gratified and will continue to work with the community to make OpenDS a superior directory-server choice," Ludo concluded. »
Related Topics >>
Identity Management Comments
Comments are listed in date ascending order (oldest first)
|
||
|
|