Search |
||
Patterns, ShmatternsPosted by chet on August 8, 2003 at 6:30 PM PDT
Seeing as how this is my first blog, I thought it was reasonable to go on a complete tangent instead of spending my soapbox time rambling on about upcoming features and cool Java graphics things. Maybe I'll get into that stuff in a later column... For years now, we've been hearing about how Patterns and Components will make our code much better, easier, reusable, etc. etc. etc. (etc.). But I have yet to see patterns or components created for the most commonly used and recreated things of all: bugs. I find myself continually writing new code with completely new features, yet I invariably end up inserting the same type of bugs in it. There's the array overrun error (at least in native code). Then there's the "Whoops! I used the wrong local variable to dereference my data structure inside of this loop bug." There's the "I forgot to initialize that variable bug." Or the "I forgot to Unlock that thing that I had previously Locked" bug. Think how much easier and better and cooler our code (and lives) would be if we no longer had to worry about creating these problems from scratch, but could just rely on standard patterns, or even reusable components to do them for us? Efficiency: Coding time would be much less because I could just grab those objects at any time and jam them into my code without even thinking about it:"I need to fail out of this loop right about here; what if I use the BadDereference pattern?"Debugging: Debugging would be way faster. We wouldn't even have to use a debugger or analyze the code at all; we could simply glance at it and find the problems by inspection: "I see you have a BadLoopVariableIncrementor pattern at work here. Let's try taking that out and see if the code works."Management: Managers and program mangers would find it much easier to quantify programmers' productivity and effectiveness: "My bugfinder script found 87 bugs in the 4 new files you've checked in. This is 6.7% more than last month; we need to make that number go down, not up." Life will be so much better with BugPatterns and BugObjects. The promises of object reusability will finally come true; after all, what single object in the software world is more used than a bug? And why do you think they called it Oops to begin with? I'll get to work soon on these patterns, and then a library of BugObjects. I'll try to open source the project so that everyone can contribute. If we can get everyone to participate, then maybe we can nail the whole spectrum of bugs and we won't have to write any of our own bugs anymore! First I have to finish working on my jdk1.5 features, which includes fixing various bugs. Man, if I could only fix them by grep'ing through the code for BugObject instances...
Chet.
»
Related Topics >>
Java Desktop Comments
Comments are listed in date ascending order (oldest first)
|
||
|
|