Search |
||
Fashionable PeoplePosted by editor on December 2, 2008 at 7:58 AM PST
The know-it-alls originally slammed Java too Plenty of bloggers and pundits have offered their opinions on the soon-to-be-released JavaFX, many of them doubting its prospects. Chris Oliver, whose F3 project gave JavaFX its starting point, blogged last week that with Thursday's expected release, now you can judge for yourself. Simon Morris has seen the punditry down on Java before, as he reminds us in his blog No Future In Java of C++ programmers posting to USENET newsgroups that Java was pointless and doomed:
And today?
Simon says that JavaFX's key advantage is its interoperability with Java and its broad and deep collection of high-quality libraries, which the developer can employ on the server, the client, between the two, or any combination thereof. Are the critics accounting for that? Or does the critcism go any deeper than "we already have Flash"? Like Chris says, we'll find out soon enough. Also in today's Weblogs Terrence Barr looks ahead to the release from a mobile perspective, in Coming on Thursday: JavaFX 1.0 including FX Mobile prerelease. "So, what about mobile, then, you ask? Well, JavaFX 1.0 will not only contain the JavaFX SDK and runtime for browsers and desktops as well as tools but also a prelease version of the FX Mobile runtime. This is very cool stuff ... the unified JavaFX development model and tool chain allows you to create applications for desktop, the browser, and mobile (and later, TV) based on the same, unmodified code and deploy and run across different platforms with the touch of a button." Switching to tutorial mode, Jim Driscoll offers JSF 2.0: The Switchlist example. "You've seen this component before: two lists, with buttons that let you move options from one list to the other. We'll use this example for our next few blog posts looking at JSF 2.0 features."
In Java Today,
Mark Reinhold's Big Think build-up continues in The Modular Java Platform, which continues a train of thought addressing the problems of The massive, monolithic JDK and Packaging Java code. "Connecting the dots Given a modularized JDK and a modularized application, the next logical step is to arrange for the application’s modules to declare dependences upon just the JDK modules that it requires. This would enable a capable native package manager such as The latest edition, issue 185 of the JavaTools Community Newsletter is out, with a reminder about the recent release of NetBeans 6.5, tool-related news from around the web, new tools in the community, and a Tool Tip on building GWT applications with Maven A new article on TheServerSide contains some interesting Pondering About JSR-315, the New Servlet 3.0 Specification. "The new specification for Servlets 3.0 is coming, and Roy van Rijn takes a good look at it. He sees some good things, but also something that makes him want to stand up and make an alternative proposal. Here it is."
In today's Forums,
Chris Campbell relates some Java2D history in Re: [JAVA2D] Poor performance of Java2D. "Yeah, we've experimented with native multisampling (in the OGL-based Java 2D pipeline, mainly) periodically over the past 5 or 6 years. In the earlier days, both performance and quality of hardware multisampling were very poor and as such it wasn't worth considering. Since then, performance has improved quite a bit, but as Clemens said, quality is still quite poor by our standards, even with e.g. 8x multisampling. The quality of hardware multisampling has generally been too poor to consider exposing even a "quick-and-dirty" mode, although that would make an interesting OpenJDK research project if anyone's up for the challenge." Current and upcoming Java Events :
Registered users can submit event listings for the java.net Events Page using our events submission form. All submissions go through an editorial review before being posted to the site. Archives and Subscriptions: This blog is delivered weekdays as the Java Today RSS feed. Also, once this page is no longer featured as the front page of java.net it will be archived along with other past issues in the java.net Archive. The know-it-alls originally slammed Java too »
Comments
Comments are listed in date ascending order (oldest first)
|
||
|
|