<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ericfreeman/">
<title>Eric Freeman&apos;s Blog</title>
<link>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ericfreeman/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-12-10T14:07:27-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.01D" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ericfreeman/archive/2004/12/java_coolness_h_1.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ericfreeman/archive/2004/12/java_coolness_h_1.html">
<title>Java, Coolness, Human Scale and Creative Environments</title>
<link>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ericfreeman/archive/2004/12/java_coolness_h_1.html</link>
<description>A third post on Java&apos;s &quot;coolness&quot; (or lack thereof), following Kathy Sierra and Brett McLaughlin&apos;s ongoing discussion.  I argue more lightweight choices built to human scale may help Java recapture vibrance.</description>
<dc:subject>J2SE</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>ericfreeman</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-12-10T14:07:27-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
