 |
No submission? Got suggestions?
Posted by pierre on January 07, 2005 at 05:05 PM | Comments (8)
There is always a great deal of interesting proposals submitted for the
JavaOne conference, and this
makes it really challenging for the various selection committees.
In his blog last Monday, Casey Cameron provided good advice for
submitters. In my case, I'd like to turn this around and ask
potential conference goers for any advice they would like to give
regarding the selection of the web-tier sessions and BOFs.
So... what web-tier related topics/speakers/events would make it
worthwhile to you at the 2005 conference?
Please let me know (comments below, or email me directly) and I'll make sure these opinions are heard.
As a reference, the 2004 web-tier selections are included below. -- Thanks!
JavaOne 2004 web-tier technical sessions
3166 Internationalization and Localization of Web Applications
2702 Web-Tier State of the Union
1580 Advanced Real-World JavaServer Faces technology-Based Application Development
2866 Blueprints for Interactive Web Applications: Designing applications for J2EE
1341 Browser Tree Framework using Java and JavaScript technologies
2471 Building Advanced J2EE 1.4 Web-Tier Applications
2218 Building real-world ready UI Components for the web using JavaServer Faces Technology
1925 Code Reuse Techniques in JavaServer Pages Technology: A Comparative Analysis
1103 Creating a Component Community for JavaServer Faces Technology
1936 Developing Advanced Graphics Components Using JavaServer Faces Technology
2987 eXtreme JavaServer Faces Technology
2553 Scripting in the Java Platform
2168 Performance Considerations for Developing Portal Applications - Based on JSR 168
1062 Portlet Specification: What is Real and What Comes Next?
2100 Putting Faces on Your Portlets: Exploiting JavaServer Faces Technology in Portlet Applications
1265 Scalable Java Technology Application Environment Infrastructure for the Web Tier
2610 Using JSF with JDO: Developing Scalable Web Applications Easily
2615 Using User Interface Modeling for Automatic Generation of Large-Scale J2EE Web Applications
1286 Why you should use the JSP 2.0 Expression Language
JavaOne 2004 web-tier BOFs
2240 Boosting Java Technology-Based Web Applications Development Productivity: A Generative Approach
3080 Dynamic VoiceXML and CCXML Applications in Java Technology
2101 JSP 2.0 Tag Libraries
1966 Unraveling WSRP and its Alignment with JSR 168
3154 Web Frameworks to Go: Productivity and Web MVC
2091 Coexistence of JSF and Struts for Web Applications Development
2693 Community Input on the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages Technologies
2938 Designing Secure Web Applications
2180 Effective WebTier Clustering
2937 J2EE Platform Blueprints for Web Services and Web Applications
2780 JSR 168 In Depth
3069 Portals, Portlets, and Web Services, Oh My! Lessons from the Trenches
2056 Testing Strategies for Java Technology Based Web Applications
2220 The Faces Behind the JavaServer Faces Technology: Developer to Developer with the JavaServer Faces Technology Team and Expert Group
Bookmark blog post:  del.icio.us  Digg  DZone  Furl  Reddit
Comments
Comments are listed in date ascending order (oldest first) | Post Comment
-
Stop accepting marketing mouthpiece presentations so you can accept more serious and niche presentations that are actually useful to the attendees.
Posted by: johnm on January 07, 2005 at 05:51 PM
-
It looks like the only web framework discussed last year was JSF. Is there any room for comparing web frameworks (i.e. WebWork, Spring MVC, Struts and Tapestry) - or discussions that relate to these "rebel" frameworks?
There are so many web frameworks for Java - it seems somewhat limiting that the only one discussed is JSF.
Posted by: mraible on January 07, 2005 at 05:52 PM
-
Accepting more talks about WebWork, Spring MVC, Tapestry etc. is a _must_. Of course you can just accept talks when they have been properly ellaborated. :-)
And, as a general suggestion to _all_ groups, please do accept talks about things people have been talking about, such as those frameworks, Spring, AOP, JBoss etc. :-P Of course some people still want to know about "old" stuff, such as EJB 2.1, webservices, portlets and of course Sun can push some technologies it finds interesting, but keep a 1/3 rate between these things, i.e., 1/3 Hot Topics, 1/3 Sun "gut feeling", 1/3 "Old" stuff
Posted by: mister__m on January 07, 2005 at 06:26 PM
-
It's very telling that people are looking at alternatives to JSP and JSF, and very gratifying that one of the most visible alternatives is Tapestry. You need to make it very clear that you are interested in providing session on what people want and need to know, rather than exclusively what Sun wants to tell them.
It's a bit of an awkward statement ... the process is so opaque there's nothing you could do that would satisfy most people.
Therefore ... make the process open. Make proposal submissions public. If a session is in- (or out) by executive fiat ... show that, and the reasoning behind it. Allow public discussion about potential sessions, even voting. Yes, not scientific. Yes, not reliable. Yes, not representative ... but open, and visible, and building of trust.
Posted by: hlship on January 07, 2005 at 06:49 PM
-
How about a talk on Portals that emphasizes development frameworks? Like how to use Struts or other MVC models with Portlets, or what other best practices in developing portlets are?
I will agree that talks on competing frameworks like Struts, Spring MVC, etc. would be great, along with other hot topics of the moment (like Spring, Hibernate, etc.), but I think an emphasis should be placed on portals this year.
Posted by: jasheets1 on January 10, 2005 at 08:45 AM
-
While there are many other outstanding frameworks available, the commentors should keep in mind that this conference seems focused on the competancies of APIs produced through the JCP (JSF, JSP, JDO, etc).
Posted by: jhook on January 10, 2005 at 11:51 AM
-
One word: Wicket.
Coming from a JSP backround, I find Wicket's "object oriented, Swing-like architecture" a breath of fresh air. I'd like to see more frameworks like it or at least have more people find out about it.
I am tired of escaping reserved characters left and right and embedding ugly scripts into JSP code. That design is fundamentally problematic. Please focus on easier-to-use alternatives.
Gili
Posted by: cowwoc on January 11, 2005 at 12:07 AM
-
I like hlship's idea of a more open process.
Posted by: emeade on January 11, 2005 at 06:04 PM
|
java.net RSS Feeds
