<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/">
<title>Pierre Delisle&apos;s Blog</title>
<link>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-09T17:16:26-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.01D" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2006/01/resource_inject_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2005/06/java_ee_webtier_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2005/01/no_submission_g_1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2004/06/more_transparen.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2006/01/resource_inject_1.html">
<title>Resource Injection and the Java Persistence API in web applications</title>
<link>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2006/01/resource_inject_1.html</link>
<description>Some thoughts on the experience of migrating the Duke&apos;s Bookstore
sample web application (in the J2EE 1.4 tutorial) from JNDI and JDBC to the
new Resource-Injection and Java-Persistence-API combo.</description>
<dc:subject>Community: Java Enterprise</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>pierre</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-09T17:16:26-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2005/06/java_ee_webtier_1.html">
<title>Java EE WebTier Expression Language: simplicity and feature-set tradeoff</title>
<link>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2005/06/java_ee_webtier_1.html</link>
<description>When some developers complain that essential features are missing, while others argue that preserving simplicity is paramount, tough decisions are to be made...</description>
<dc:subject>Community: Java Enterprise</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>pierre</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2005-06-27T07:43:35-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2005/01/no_submission_g_1.html">
<title>No submission? Got suggestions?</title>
<link>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2005/01/no_submission_g_1.html</link>
<description>I&apos;ll have the privilege to serve on the selection committee for the
web-tier related submissions for the upcoming 
JavaOne conference. Got any advice I should bring to the committee?</description>
<dc:subject>Community: Java Enterprise</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>pierre</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2005-01-07T17:05:58-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2004/06/more_transparen.html">
<title>More transparency into the JSTL Expert Group spec work</title>
<link>http://weblogs.java.net/blog/pierre/archive/2004/06/more_transparen.html</link>
<description>The jstl-spec-public project has just been launched to increase
transparency into the JavaServer Pages Standard Tag Library (JSTL)
specification work.</description>
<dc:subject>Community: Java Enterprise</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>pierre</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-06-10T13:43:32-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
