Poll Result: New java.net Is Better, But Still Needs Improvement
The results of the last java.net poll indicate that the community in general considers the new java.net to be better than the previous edition of the site -- but further improvement in many areas is still needed. The poll was designed to be a forum through which the community could provide feedback on the changes to java.net that were implemented starting in late February. A total of 96 votes were cast, and a valuable conversation was carried on in 15 posted comments.
The actual question and voting results were:
Now that you're accustomed to it, what do you think of the new java.net?
- 20% (19 votes) - It's much improved
- 45% (43 votes) - It's better, but some areas still need improvement
- 9% (9 votes) - I likejava.net about the same as I did before
- 19% (18 votes) - The old site was better
- 3% (3 votes) - I don't know
- 4% (4 votes) - Other
For java.net, this is a very positive set of numbers (65% consider the site to be improved compared with its previous edition). At the same time, it's clear that most people who chose to vote believe java.net could be better. The posted comments emphasize this by pointing out several problem areas, and pointing out the seriousness of the site's deficiencies.
wadechandler, in a thoughtful and detailed comment, said:
I think whoever is working on Java.net needs to seriously check out SourceForge.net and GitHub.com. I find Java.net to be quite "anti-social" with its anemic feature set. Heck, I'm honestly trying to use it out of loyalty and all, but it is pretty frustrating in some areas, and I'm debating going back to SourceForge for my own projects because who has time to waste.
One of the problems with java.net is the lack of documentation for the users. For example, Wade asked "How do I contact and arbitrary user of Java.net? So, I know their name and their user name, and I want to send them a message..."
It's actually quite easy to accomplish this on java.net, because sending an email to javaNetUserName@java.net automatically forwards the message to that user. But, only a few people know this. In addition, the performance of email initiated through java.net addresses has often been poor (including project email lists). The performance problems are being addressed. But, if you'd like to contact an arbitrary java.net user, and you send an email to javaNetUserName@java.net, you can be pretty certain that your message will get through, ultimately.
Java.net really could use a User's Guide of some sort, whether a wiki, or a java-net-doc project, or something like that. The java.net team is aware of our documentation deficit -- but, reading the comments posted to this poll makes me think this is a more serious problem than I had considered it to be before now.
New poll: JavaFX 2.0 Beta
Our new poll asks "Do you intend to experiment with the JavaFX 2.0 Beta Release?" Voting will be open until this Friday, June 24.
Since my last blog post (New java.net Article: Reducing Contention and Overhead in Worker Queues), the following java.net blogs have been published by other java.net bloggers:
- Ed Burns, Ultra quick JSF 2.2 in progress changelog;
- Fabrizio Giudici, Switching to TestNG;
- Osvaldo Pinali Doederlein, Interested in JavaFX? The JIRA is your friend; and
- Cay Horstmann, http://www.java.net/blog/cayhorstmann/archive/2011/06/18/there-will-be-monads.
Our latest java.net article is "A Method for Reducing Contention and Overhead in Worker Queues for Multithreaded Java Applications", by Sathiskumar Palaniappan, Kavitha Varadarajan, and Jayashree Viswanathan.
Here are the stories we've recently featured in our Java news section:
- Max Bonbhel reminds African developers to Recall - Android Developer Challenge, Africa!!;
- Shai Almog reports that the LWUIT project is Dropping Support For RIM JDE 4.7;
- Adam Bien reports that you can have Maven 3 Milliseconds Deployment ... With NetBeans 7 and Java EE 6;
- Evgeny Goldin presents Groovy 1.8.0 - meet JsonBuilder!;
- Farrukh Najmi talks about Developing Android Apps with NetBeans, Maven, and VirtualBox;
- Ludovic Poitou announces that OpenDJ 2.4.3 is now available;
- Ilias Tsagklis presents a JavaFX 2.0 beta sample application and after thoughts;
- Jean-Francois Arcand discusses Improving HTTP Long Polling performance using ETag;
- The Jenkins Blog discusses the first Jenkins Long-Term Support Release;
- Shai Almog presents LWUIT's New Layout Animation Facility;
- Markus Eisele investigates Dynamically registering WebFilter with Java EE 6; and
- Adam Bien discusses @Inject With Package-Private Fields Only, Or Harmful Accessors.
Our latest java.net href="http://www.java.net/archive/spotlight">Spotlight is Yolande Poirier's Java and Parallelism Computing: An Interview with Java Developer and Researcher Dr. Gilda Garretón:
Electric VLSI Design System is an open source VLSI CAD application used as a research platform for new CAD algorithms as well as the research flow for hardware test chips. Worldwide, Electric is used in academia and small industry. The CAD applications are time-consuming tools applied to very large data sets (circuit designs). With those important characteristics, plus the fact that Electric is fully implemented in Java, this framework has been the perfect environment to apply cutting edge parallel techniques on multicore processors in Java...
We're also featuring Java Spotlight Episode 34: Chuck Munn Lee on Using PhoneME on Nintendo DS:
Interview with Chuck Mun Lee, Java Evangelist, on porting PhoneME to Nintendo DS. Joining us this week on the Java All Star Developer Panel are Dalibor Topic, Java Free and Open Source Software Ambassador, and Alexis Moussine-Pouchkine, Java EE Developer Advocate...
Subscriptions and Archives: You can subscribe to this blog using the java.net Editor's Blog Feed. You can also subscribe to the Java Today RSS feed and the java.net blogs feed. You can find historical archives of what has appeared the front page of java.net in the java.net home page archive.